[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Color transforms for small subset
- To: "'tass@wwa.com'" <tass@wwa.com>
- Subject: Color transforms for small subset
- From: "Gutzwiller, Michael" <mgutzwiller@lanvision.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:09:19 -0400
- Old-Return-Path: <mgutzwiller@lanvision.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:05:37 -0400
- Resent-From: tass@wwa.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"T6BlnB.A.1sD.wiAd1"@kani.wwa.com>
- Resent-Sender: tass-request@wwa.com
I looked for Landolt standards in the small subset of data I've been
using to determine how well my mini TASS catalog matches the Landolt
standard magnitudes and what the color transform might look like.
I found 7 standards in my little subset. The results are shown below:
Before transform:
V I
TASS Landolt Error TASS Landolt Error
11.326 11.302 0.024 10.553 10.493 0.060
9.999 10.010 -0.011 9.929 9.836 0.093
10.853 10.803 0.050 10.240 10.179 0.061
9.587 9.574 0.013 9.036 8.963 0.073
8.745 8.737 0.008 8.225 8.162 0.063
10.892 10.938 -0.046 9.261 9.253 0.008
11.526 11.491 0.035 10.785 10.660 0.125
Doing a least squares fit I get a color transform of:
V = Vt - 0.032 + 0.030*(Vt - It)
I = It - 0.105 + 0.052*(Vt - It)
(This isn't really right since I should transform each I filter
separately and I should weight the measurements by their errors but it
should be close.)
Using this transform I get:
V I
Transf Landolt Error Transf Landolt Error
11.318 11.302 0.016 10.488 10.493 -0.005
9.969 10.010 -0.041 9.827 9.836 -0.009
10.840 10.803 0.037 10.166 10.179 -0.013
9.572 9.574 -0.002 8.959 8.963 -0.004
8.729 8.737 -0.008 8.147 8.162 -0.015
10.910 10.938 -0.028 9.240 9.253 -0.013
11.517 11.491 0.026 10.718 10.660 0.058
Standard Deviation
0.028 0.026
The transformed magnitudes seem to match quite well.
All in all I think the flat compensation program's algorithm seems
sound. With a little additional work it should be ready for general use
soon.
Mike G.