[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Color transforms for small subset
- To: tass@wwa.com
- Subject: RE: Color transforms for small subset
- From: "Gutzwiller, Michael" <mgutzwiller@lanvision.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:48:59 -0400
- Old-Return-Path: <mgutzwiller@lanvision.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 15:46:45 -0400
- Resent-From: tass@wwa.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"CNGva.A.KDB.IhFd1"@kani.wwa.com>
- Resent-Sender: tass-request@wwa.com
The transforms are based on the 5 night set I've described earlier and
are based on average magnitudes for the Landolt stars seen. To be
eligible the star must have been seen on at least 4 of the 5 nights with
good photometry.
I too was surprised by the offset in I and will investigate further.
Mike G.
-----Original Message-----
From: aah@nofs.navy.mil [SMTP:aah@nofs.navy.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 2:37 PM
To: tass@wwa.com
Subject: Re: Color transforms for small subset
Mike G. gave a table of Landolt offsets for his mini-TASS
catalog. Mike,
was this the 4-night dataset, so that these measures are
averages for
all 4 nights, or what? I'm surprised there is a large zero
point offset
for the I band; I would have expected numbers like the V
transform. Perhaps
it is just small number statistics.
However, your coeffients are in the same ballpark as the
numbers I
derived for the SMSP exercise, so looks like you are heading in
the
right direction.
Arne