[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Puzzle Solution and Compression
- To: tass@wwa.com
- Subject: RE: Puzzle Solution and Compression
- From: mgutzwiller@lanvision.com
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 14:32:53 -0400
- Old-Return-Path: <mgutzwiller@lanvision.com>
- Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 14:57:08 -0400
- Resent-From: tass@wwa.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"4cC0yC.A.ZS.a4iL2"@kani.wwa.com>
- Resent-Sender: tass-request@wwa.com
Tom et al.,
A co-worker of mine actually got interested in compressing Mark III images
using a scheme similar to what Herb suggested. By dropping the lower 4 bits
and using differences between pixel values he was able to get compression
ratios of about 3.5 to 1. Dropping the lower 4 bits made no difference to
the Star program's results since the noise was on the order of 6 bits anyway
in my light polluted skies. A similar approach might be usable for the Mark
IV.
Note that using only the upper 12 bits would still give us a dynamic range
of 4096 to 1.
Mike G.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Droege [mailto:droege@fnal.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 1998 1:57 PM
To: tass@wwa.com; hjohnson@pluto.njcc.com
Subject: Re: Puzzle Solution
Herb,
I hope to get to 10,000 to one. This is what Lockheed
claims is possible,
and I hope to get there. This does not leave much room for
compression.
Only a few percent will be possible, I think.
Tom
At 12:49 PM 10/21/98 -0400, you wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Oct 1998 12:04:26 -0500, Tom Droege
<droege@fnal.gov> wrote:
>*>I would like to congratulate Andrew Bennett for correctly
solving the
>*>puzzle. Below is his complete solution:
>*>
>*>>
>*>>It looks a lot like you are getting the wrong high order
>*>>byte - either the one before or the one after.
>*>>
>*>>Andrew Bennett, Avondale Vineyard, Nova Scotia, Canada.
>*>>
>
>Facinating! I was suspecious of a byte order problem: it
did not
>occur to me casually it was a "byte sequence" problem.
Congratulations!
>
>Tom, as you are looking at all the bits, let us know when
you have
>a measure for the reliable dynamic range of the new design.
We've
>talked about data compression recently, and a simple
compression
>scheme would be to remove the lowest and presumably
unreliable bits.
>And of course it affects small difference measurements and
so on.
>
>Herb Johnson
>
>Herb Johnson
>Herbert R. Johnson
http://pluto.njcc.com/~hjohnson
>hjohnson@pluto.njcc.com voice 609-771-1503, New
Jersey USA
>
> amateur astronomer and astro-tour guide
> classic S-100 computers restoration & parts as "Dr.
S-100"
> rebuilder/reseller of classic Macs for your computing
pleasure
> and senior engineer at Astro Imaging Systems
>