[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CD16 vs CD15

To: Andrew Bennett <andrew.bennett@ns.sympatico.ca>, tass@listserv.wwa.com
Subject: Re: CD16 vs CD15
From: Tom Droege <tdroege@veriomail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 17:43:04 -0500
Delivery-Date: Sat Oct 28 18:42:15 2000
In-Reply-To: <a0dmvskc3kc16eh0imrd538f46tbamn2j0@4ax.com>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

Andrew,

Congratulations on the record crop.  I assume it is the result of record 
hard work to make it happen.

Also thank you for the news on disk 16.  The analysis is really appreciated.

Looks like the whole Mark IV system is go.  There is little left that I can 
improve.

Tom Droege

At 09:59 PM 10/28/00 +0100, you wrote:
>CD16 has the new tweaked value of VVH to give improved
>saturation performance. CD15 provides a comparison.
>
>Saturation values.

References:
- CD16 vs CD15
  - From: Andrew Bennett <andrew.bennett@ns.sympatico.ca>

Prev by Date: CD16 vs CD15
Next by Date: Target zone selection
Prev by thread: CD16 vs CD15
Next by thread: Target zone selection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread