[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which public license?/ GPL

To: Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com>, tass@listserv.wwa.com
Subject: Re: Which public license?/ GPL
From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 12:33:39 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20020208181904.94177.qmail@web14702.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <sc63b818.077@gw-fs1.shands.ufl.edu>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

OK, I agree with GPL if that helps.  ;^)

Tom Droege

At 10:19 AM 2/8/02 -0800, you wrote:

>We had this come up a long time ago.  The answer was "GPL"
>I don't think there has been any disagreement about this.
>
>--- Mark Pitts <PITTS@shands.ufl.edu> wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > As part of our SourceForge project registration, we have to select a
> > license that will apply to those who want to use, copy, modify, etc.

References:
- Which public license?
  - From: "Mark Pitts" <PITTS@shands.ufl.edu>
- Re: Which public license?/ GPL
  - From: Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: first cut at a database table layout
Next by Date: Re: weak pixels, etc.
Prev by thread: Re: Which public license?/ GPL
Next by thread: first cut at a database table layout
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread