[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)

To: tass@listserv.wwa.com
Subject: Re: GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)
From: jg <jg@jgws.freeisp.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 11:34:54 +0000
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20020605181450.01bbc910@pop.earthlink.net> <5.0.0.25.2.20020605231339.02ea2aa0@pop.earthlink.net> <3CFF43F8.B529A7AE@jgws.freeisp.co.uk>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

jg wrote:

> Did you know that TASS churns out two colour photometry?  So do I.

Should have read :-

> Did you know that TASS churns out two colour photometry?  You did?  So _did_ I.


I personally do very little churning of any kind ;^)

John

References:
- Beware of DS23
  - From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>
- Re: Beware of DS23
  - From: Tom Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>
- GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)
  - From: jg <jg@jgws.freeisp.co.uk>

Prev by Date: GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)
Next by Date: Useful Research?
Prev by thread: GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)
Next by thread: Re: GSC 0279 0321 is probably not an eclipser (also note on colour index use)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread