[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> John wrote, in response to MK's question:
> >Anything wrong with just writing "possibly associated with 1rxs etc",
> >given a negative result check has been made for any other association, I
> >wonder ?
> That should be ok, though I would look at the DSS/VizieR and convince myself
> there isn't something else more likely within the 26arcsec error radius.
> It could be an AGN or a multitude of other Xray sources.
As noted in an earlier post, I've already checked dss images and simbad
via aladin with nothing found.
Can't remember whether I checked vizier via aladin or directly though,
which are two quite different things (aladin vizier interface is select
one catalogue at a time, vizier vizier interface is search a whole lot
of catalogues at once, with the former you have to be aware of all
relevant catalogue keyword names else you miss things).