Re: positions and other pipeline matters

[jg <jg@jgws.freeisp.co.uk>]

Chris Albertson wrote:
> 
> --- aah@nofs.navy.mil wrote:
> 
>   What I would do is take
> > the TASS position and see what UCAC objects are nearby.  If several
> > fall within the match radius, then pick the brightest and assign the
> > TASS object to that.
> 
> Why not mark it as a suspected blend of N catalogged objects and
> then list each of the N objects.  It's not hard to do as you have
> already found each of the N objects.
> There is no reason to asign a UCAC possition to a TASS observation
> as long as you keep the cross identification.
> 
Is UCAC2 still going to use south polar distance for y position?

Will the instrumental "red" magnitudes still be retained in the
catalogue.

Just out of interest.

Cheers

John G.