Re: new stars and such

[Michael Sallman <msallman@pro-ns.net>]

Michael,

There are 12 stars in the database between 14hr - 18hr with W-S
greater than 5. Of those, 3 match GCVS variables (175165 - CC Her,161429
- AF Vir,118905 - CK Boo). 3 have bad obs that are skewing the results.
(looks like I still missed a couple of bad days)

These are the 6 remaining:

id	ra		dec	v_mag	v_sig	i_mag	i_sig	W-S	

105239	213.9456	8.1364	10.550	0.190	9.760	0.203	17.19	
119075	220.0445	6.2865	11.423	0.167	11.104	0.122	5.86	
166278	245.0134	7.1246	9.875	0.087	8.953	0.082	9.97	
166925	248.7951	5.8473	11.748	0.093	11.137	0.093	5.78	
152307	252.2180	8.3187	11.665	0.147	11.006	0.134	7.85	
159077	256.7212	6.5836	11.089	0.157	10.529	0.150	11.77	

Mike

Michael Koppelman wrote:

   > OK, data divers, I need a new star. Hopefully something where 14h < 
RA <
   > 18h or so. I'm going to start looking, too. There may be some stuff all
   > the way back from DS23 that I could do.
   >
   > My RR Lyr star is over for the season. I'm going to poke around with
   > AAVSO stars and maybe a CBA star or too in the interim. Meanwhile, I'm
   > still working on my all-sky photometry, too. Hard in non-photometric
   > Minnesota, but I want the skills, dammit.
   >
   > The fervor over the ASAS data should be motivating for you guys with
   > TASS cameras, since it doesn't get the northern stuff. I know Tom is
   > grabbing data like a madman.
   >
   > Arne, if you are reading this, do you think the two stars I talked 
about
   > at the AAVSO should be in one paper, two papers, or zero papers? I 
would
   > like to include the Patrick's WD model for the EB and my (soon to
   > improve) Mv analysis of the RRab. What are your thoughts? I can provide
   > powerpoint slides to others who would have an opinion. In case you
   > haven't noticed, I long for co-authors -- I have no problem sharing
   > credit.
   >
   > Cheers,
   > Michael Koppelman
   > http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/
   >
   >
   >