[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mark IV data off by one day
Well done Richard! Thx for the info re asteroid colour, too. g.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Miles" <rmiles.btee@btinternet.com>
To: "Thomas Droege" <tdroege2@earthlink.net>; "Billings, Gary W."
<obs681@telusplanet.net>; <tass@listserv.wwa.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Mark IV data off by one day
> Tom / Gary,
>
> I have an unambiguous ID from the Mark IV data.
>
> Your TASS ID = 8103940 = 739 Mandeville
>
> The frame said to have been taken on 2453108.82002 was actually taken on
> 2453109.82002
>
> The coincidence between measured and predicted is as follows:
>
> Measured, Predicted
> RA: 220.5640, 220.5666
> Dec: 18.9797, 18.9791
> V: 11.945, 12.0
> I: 11.221, 11.3
>
> Unambiguous proof that for this one frame the posted date is exactly 1 day
> earlier than actual.
>
> Note that the V-I indices of asteroids equate almost exactly (to within
> about 0.1 mag) of their B-V indices.
> The typicval range of V-I is +0.6 to +1.1.
>
> Cheers,
> Richard Miles
>