[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: date error, alleged

To: tdroege2@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: date error, alleged
From: Michael Koppelman <lolife@bitstream.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:26:32 -0500
Cc: tass <tass@listserv.wwa.com>, mwrsps@ritvax.rit.edu, "Man, Stupendous" <richmond@stupendous.cis.rit.edu>, Patrick Wils <patrickwils@yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: <410-220046612231820741@earthlink.net>
References: <410-220046612231820741@earthlink.net>
Sender: owner-tass@listserv.wwa.com

I agree. We have some evidence that suggests this may have happened but 
there are other explanations as well.

I know there are plans underway to synchronize via the network in the 
near future. This will be a very good step forward. Sub-second accuracy 
of your clock is very achievable and is the only way to go.

Cheers,
Michael

On Jun 12, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Thomas Droege wrote:

> I wish you all would quite calling it a date error.  I don't think we 
> know
> that yet. 
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: date error, alleged
  - From: Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: date error, alleged
  - From: Thomas Droege <tdroege2@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: astronomical software library
Next by Date: Re: date error, alleged
Prev by thread: Re: date error, alleged
Next by thread: Re: date error, alleged
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread